I’m infertile and I had a threesome with my wife and another man. Then she fell pregnant with twins. Several years later, I want to disown the kids

• A New Zealand man legally disowned twin girls
• He had a threesome with his wife and another man
• The man proved he was infertile at time of conception 
• READ MORE: Parents urged to never give kids hot water bottles

A man has successfully disowned his twin daughters and proven himself ‘sexually free’ after his ex-wife was impregnated during a threesome.

The New Zealand man won the court battle earlier this year but documents of the strange case were only revealed by the Family Court this week.

The court heard the former couple separated around two years ago but were only officially divorced three months ago.

After their divorce, the man sought to remove his name from the twins’ birth certificate.

Their mother claimed he was trying to avoid any child support obligations while the man said he wanted to ‘defend his honour’.

They had previously adopted children together but the man had undergone a vasectomy some 12 years before the girls, who are now teenagers, were born.

At the time of the twins’ conception, the ex-couple were having regular threesomes with another man – believed to be the twins’ biological father.

A New Zealand man was granted a non-paternity order after arguing the true father of his twins was a second man he and his ex-wife had a threesome with

Their mother told the court their relationship with the second man was to help her get pregnant – which her ex-husband denied.

‘Whether this was for pleasure or to conceive a child remains a point of disagreement but the fact is that the parties were in this arrangement at the time of conception,’ Judge Traicee McKenzie said in her ruling, the NZ Herald reports.

‘Once the parties separated, the relationships soured and this application was made.’

Despite not believing he was the father, the twins took the ex-husband’s surname and his name was listed on the birth certificate – which he sought to remove.

Their mother insisted her ex-husband was involved in the twins’ lives and took them on holidays, bought them presents with the girls calling him ‘Dad’.

READ MORE: Ugly moment parents clash in heated fight at under-nines rugby

In his 2020 will, the man included the twins as discretionary beneficiaries and called them ‘my children’.

However, the mother admitted he wasn’t a ‘hands-on’ father.

The man denied her claims and said he had only holidayed with the girls once and cut contact with them as soon as the pair were separated.

Judge McKenzie found the twins also made no effort to seek a relationship with him. 

‘I must take into account his rigid, consistent and immoveable views from the date of separation that he rejected any form of relationship with the girls or that the girls were his own biological children,’ she said.

‘He has made it clear from the outset that he wants no relationship with them.

‘…There was no evidence in any detail of the nature of that relationship. No evidence of any expression of love or affection between them that would have been expected between a father and his daughter.

‘They were children who lived in his house.’

The man was granted a non-paternity order and his name was removed from the twins’ birth certificates. 

The man argued he had no relationship with the twin girls, while his ex-wife said he was trying to get out of paying child support

Following the ruling, the man told the Herald he had sought the order to ‘defend his honour’.

‘I am not a family man,’ he said.

He explained the couple had led an ‘unconventional’ home life with him living in a separate part of the home to his wife and the children since 2018.

He added he didn’t really participate in the threesome and mostly ‘just watched’ but was under the assumption his ex-wife and the other man were ‘safe’ and using birth control.

‘I don’t expect you or anyone to understand but I was happy with my life,’ he said.

‘I have no sexual prudence. I am sexually free.’

Source: Read Full Article